Welcome "R" Church to the Ecclesia Network.
Bob Hyatt
September 20, 2010

“R” church is a new congregation comprised of developing missional communities on the Southside of Richmond, VA.  “R” church is being sponsored by Imago Dei and is led by Matt and Amy Senger.  We are excited to have them part of our growing family and look forward to see what God is going to do through this new expression.  Matt and Amy are two of the most gifted leaders you could meet and we are honored to have them part of Ecclesia.

Here’s a brief description of “R” Church

R church is a newly forming church in the suburbs of Richmond, Virginia.  We find ourselves creating spaces for people in a variety of settings that serve to create community and show people who Jesus is. Seeing people form into disciples of Jesus is what we aim for in all we do.  As we take on the posture of a missionary our hope is to create communities that make disciples.

Also, check out this interview with Matt about “R” Church:

Matt, tell us a bit about what has influenced the beginnings of “R” church?

As a newly forming church, recently named Rchurch, we are excited about what we have been experiencing together.  In starting we have placed a big emphasis on discipleship and maintaining a healthy rhythm as a church.  In this we created a discipleship environment that lends itself to offering a lot of support and accountability with a high degree of challenge.  From this we have seen significant growth from those that are involved in this relational form of discipleship.  We are already seeing how this growth is forming us as missionaries in our context.

R church is planting and establishing multiple mid-sized missional communities, tell us a little bit about that process?

As a church we have found focus in one particular suburban neighborhood outside of Richmond.  We have spent several months together creating what we call a missional community there.  A missional community is basically a small church, big enough to carry out its mission, but not so big that relationships become lost.  One distinguishing factor in this community is that it is driven by its mission.  For the past few months forming this community has been about building trust and relationships through consistency in serving and providing space for the neighborhood to come together.  We have done this by serving the neighborhood through several large and small community events and dinners.  We have introduced spiritual content along the way by explaining what we are doing with those involved. It is hoped that this Fall we will enter into a new phase with this community.  We are hoping to establish more of a spiritual influence within the trust and relationships that we have created.  Part of this will include developing smaller sub-groups within the larger community that create room for spiritual conversation.  In addition to this there are also two other groups that are newly forming, but do not yet have the momentum of the neighborhood missional community.  These groups are split between kayakers and triathletes.

What principles have you been using to guide the development of these missional communities?

We have defined our schedule and practice in the language of UP, IN, and OUT.  Basically doing things that are focused on God, building relationships within the church, and serving those we are trying to reach.    We are hoping to one day establish these rhythms within each missional community that is being developed.  In all we do we are keeping disciple making at the front of what we are doing as we take on the posture of missionaries in our context.

Lastly, tell us a little about your progress?

Over the past few months we have interacted with those that are currently not in the church that once were, and those that have never had any part of church.  We have had spiritual conversations with those that know Jesus and those that have no clear idea of what the gospel is.  What can be said is that in the first few months our team of believers has grown spiritually while laying the groundwork for disciple making within their own lives.  We have also seen a new church community forming in a suburb outside of Richmond that is made up of people seeking God while experiencing something they are unfamiliar with, the Church.

By Bob Hyatt September 15, 2025
A New Ecclesia Network Benefit! 
By By Jim Pace September 15, 2025
In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s shooting, social media has been filled with perspectives, as is typically the case. I am reluctant to add mine as there seems to be no lack one way or the other. To be clear, this is not just about Charlie Kirk, this is about violence across the board. I did not feel led to write this because it was Charlie Kirk specifically, but rather another in a long and winding line of acts of violence, that my ministering at Va. Tech gives me a bit of personal experience with. But as I have just finished teaching two classes on Christian Ethics, and as I was encountering again the spread of responses from my Christian sisters and brothers, I felt led to look at this event through that lens. Ethics, at its base, seeks to answer the question, “What is better or worse? Good or bad?” As a follower of Jesus, this is what seems right to me… 1. We never celebrate harm. Whatever our disagreements, rejoicing at a shooting violates the bedrock claim that every person bears the imago Dei (Gen 1:27). Scripture is explicit: “Do not rejoice when your enemy falls” (Prov 24:17); “Love your enemies, pray for those who persecute you” (Matt 5:44); “Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good” (Rom 12:21). I don’t love blasting verses like this, but you cannot get away from them if you are reading the scriptures. 2. Moral responsibility sits with the shooter—full stop . Saying “his rhetoric got him shot” smuggles in a just-world logic that excuses violence. As a contextual theologian, I have an enormous amount of respect for the impact our various narratives have in shaping our understandings of the world around us. They are inescapable. But that is not what I am talking about here. Ideas can be wrong, harmful, or worth opposing vigorously, but vigilante ‘payback’ is never a Christian category. My primary gig is that of a consultant for churches and non-profits. Today, in my meetings and among friends, I have heard some variation of “He got what he deserved,” and “I vote for some very public justice for the shooter.” Both of these views speak of revenge; the follower of Jesus is called to lay these down as our Messiah did. Not asked to, told to. 3. Grief and outrage about gun violence are legitimate; schadenfreude is not . Channel the pain toward nonviolent, concrete action (policy advocacy, community intervention, survivor support), not dehumanization. Here are four thinkers who have had a profound impact on the Christian ethic I try to work out in this world. As I share them, three things are worthy of mention. One, I certainly do not claim to follow their guidance perfectly, and at times I do not even do it well, but they have all given me what seems like a Jesus-centered and faith-filled direction to move in. Second, I do not claim to speak for them in this particular matter; I am merely showing how my ethical lens has been formed. Third, clearly I am not dealing with all the components of our response to these types of violence, this is not a comprehensive treatment, merely the reflections in the moment. Stanley Hauerwas : “Christian nonviolence is not a strategy to rid the world of violence.” It’s part of following Jesus, not a tactic we drop when it’s inconvenient. Stanley Hauerwas, Walking with God in a Fragile World, by James Langford, editor, Leroy S. Rouner, editor N. T. Wright : “The call of the gospel is for the church to implement the victory of God in the world through suffering love.” Simply Good News: Why the Gospel Is News and What Makes It Good. In other words, we answer evil without mirroring it. David Fitch : Our culture runs on an “enemy-making” dynamic; even “the political rally… depends on the making of an enemy. Don’t let that train your soul.” The Church of Us vs. Them. Sarah Coakley : Contemplation forms resistance, not passivity. For Coakley, sustained prayer trains perception and courage so Christians can resist abuse and give voice against violence (it’s not quietism). “Contemplation, if it is working aright, is precisely that which gives courage to resist abuse, to give voice against violence.” Sarah Coakley, God, Sexuality, and the Self. Coakley would say that far too often we react before we reflect. This is the problem that Fitch is getting at in much of his writing, that our culture actually runs on antagonisms, the conflict between us. We need to find a better way.